一诺倾情

对话重庆直播卖烧烤为先心病儿筹款的单身母亲：暂拒后续捐助政府已在协助_我的网站

看不见的客人

A | The OPCW’s lack of a coherent, objective and fair-minded response to recent crises centered around Syria and Russia demonstrates its politicization and domination by Western interests, and the longer the watchdog stays out of Ukraine, the better, former diplomats, geopolitical observers, and international legal experts have told Sputnik.,“In Ukraine, the OPCW has fortunately not been pressed into action. This, I suspect, is because the US is satisfied with the situation as it is, with no need for the US itself to be drawn in, as would no doubt be the case if a chemical attack was fabricated,” Peter Ford, Britain’s former ambassador to Syria, said.,The veteran diplomat, who warned the British government against the folly of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and stressed that the campaign by Western powers to topple the Syrian government in the 2010s could open a “Pandora’s box” of endless crises, said the Syria case demonstrated clearly that the OPCW is no longer an independent, impartial agency.,“The Syria crisis proved without a shadow of a doubt that the Western powers have bent the OPCW to their own will, destroying in the process the organization’s credibility, probably irretrievably. This is a tragedy for world peace,” Ford stressed, referring to documented OPCW efforts to censor and smear agency whistleblowers who revealed that the watchdog’s report on the April 2018 chemical attack in Douma, Syria, was doctored to implicate the Assad government.,Today is 4 years since Douma massacre. US claimed it was a chemical weapons attack & bombed Syria. OPCW found no evidence of CW, but its findings were doctored & censored. Also confirmed is that a hospital scene was staged. Ongoing OPCW cover-up denies justice to Douma victims.— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) April 7, 2022,In Ukraine, Ford fears, the international community can now only depend on “self-interested restraint on the part of the Pentagon in controlling its proxies rather than the deterrent power of a genuinely impartial international watchdog.”,Chemical Weapons Danger in Ukraine,Since the escalation of the crisis in Ukraine in February, Russia has sent the OPCW and its technical secretariat over two dozen notes warning of possible staged provocations by Ukrainian forces or radical nationalists involving chemical weapons. Last month, the agency assured the international community that it was “closely monitoring the situation in Ukraine” for chemical weapons use.,On Wednesday, the Russian military indicated that it had information regarding Kiev's plans to stage a provocation in the Donetsk People’s Republic using chlorine gas to accuse Moscow of indiscriminate attacks targeting chemically hazardous objects.,Situation in UkraineLIVE UPDATES: Moscow Warns OPCW of Possible Provocations by Kiev With Chemical Weapons in DPRYesterday, 08:12 GMT,Alessandro Bruno, a Toronto-based geopolitical analyst and political observer at Lombardi Letter, says that while the OPCW’s official mission and goals are “certainly worth pursuing,” the problem is the watchdog’s control by Western interests seeking to obfuscate the truth and objectivity in favor of politicized objectives.,“They seem to have targeted only specific sides in specific wars to suit specific aims, which typically are those of Western powers. There have been many efforts to manipulate these organizations by the dominant powers, particularly in the West,” Bruno said.,The scholar recalled instances of claims by the US and its allies about Russia’s use of chemical weapons, from the allegation that Russia poisoned pro-Western Ukrainian presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko in the mid-2000s, to the 2018 Novichok scandal in Britain, which “many thoughtful journalists have debunked,” to the Alexei Navalny “poisoning” saga of 2020, which doctors treating the opposition vlogger have debunked.,Russians Did It! A List of Dastardly Deeds Ridiculously Blamed on the Kremlin22 March 2018, 14:14 GMT,“Yet the accusations of chemical weapons that Russia used have persisted, even though they defied all logic. That's the biggest issue with these organizations. They must be more neutral. Their headquarters must be in more neutral locations because the fact that many of these organizations operate from Western capitals makes them more prone to Western media misinformation,” Bruno said.,The geopolitical analyst still fears that the West could use the pretext of ‘Russian chemical weapons use’ in Ukraine “to get more directly involved in the conflict and potentially trigger a much wider physical war.”,“So far, I think, some of the powers came to understand that making an accusation like that in this conflict would be riskier than the accusations they made in Syria and Iraq, Navalny and Yushchenko and so on, that this would have much bigger implications, that this would blow back against the West,” Bruno stressed.,Tool of US Interests,Christopher C. Black, an international criminal and human rights lawyer with 20 years of experience covering war crimes and international relations, echoed Bruno’s sentiments about the OPCW’s noble stated aims and their stark contrast with the body's actual history, which “shows that [the watchdog] acts to serve the interests of the United States and its NATO and other allies.”,“We saw strong evidence of this when the USA tried to get rid of the Director General Jose Bustani of Brazil in 2002, when the United States was preparing its invasion of Iraq and John Bolton went to The Hague and threatened his family if he did not resign,” Black recalled, pointing to Bustani’s 2018 interview with The Intercept in which the former OPCW chief detailed the threats made against his children living in the United States.,“We Know Where Your Kids Live” John Bolton threatened head of chemical weapons commission as part of effort launch war against Iraq https://t.co/p8uluxbWGH— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) April 2, 2018,“In August 2020, it was revealed through leaks from Austrian government sources that the OPCW and British claims that Novichok had been found in the blood of the Skripals allegedly poisoned in the UK were false, that in fact no such agent had been found in their blood at all. But the findings were suppressed and a false report issued to back the UK claims,” the lawyer added. “Similar results were seen regarding the alleged poisoning of Mr. Navalny. We can quickly understand what goes on behind the scenes at the OPCW,” Black said.,'Novichok' Would Have Killed Navalny, Developer of Substance Says2 September 2020, 15:26 GMT,Black finds it unlikely that the chemical weapons watchdog will change “without a change in the balance of power in the world,” which is taking place, but whose effects on international organizations will be slow to appear.,In Ukraine, the lawyer fears, “We cannot expect any objective consideration of Kiev regime or NATO claims of Russia using chemical weapons in Ukraine for the reasons stated above, despite the fact that Russia has not used them, does not use them and will not use them. To the contrary, we have a situation in which Kiev and NATO forces keep making false claims while themselves preparing chemical weapons attacks to be staged as false flag attacks to be blamed on Russia and when Russia asks the OPCW to investigate this, Russia is met with silence,” he said.,How OPCW Can Regain Credibility,Dr. Alfred De Zayas, a lawyer, writer and former independent expert on international order with the United Nations, similarly doubts the OPCW’s ability to reform itself under current conditions, saying the agency “has long been instrumentalized to pursue the geopolitical interests of Western powers.”,The international legal expert is confident that agencies like the OPCW, the International Criminal Court and the Human Rights Council can regain their credibility by demonstrating impartiality. “This is possible if the BRICS countries become more vocal and more visible on the international scene. There is no reason why African, Asian and Latin American countries should dance to the tune of the ‘Washington consensus’,” De Zayas stressed.,In Ukraine, the OPCW’s assurance about “monitoring the situation” carries only a “purely propagandistic value,” and is “intended to charge and convict Russia even before there is any evidence of violations of the Chemical Weapons Convention,” the observer believes.,“If the OPCW investigates not only potential Russian war crimes, but also expands its investigation to potential chemical weapons violations and war crimes by Ukrainian forces and by foreign mercenaries, including US, UK, French, Georgian and others, then the OPCW might regain some credibility. That, however, would be ‘out of character’. It is not unlike the ICC, which in the eyes of many observers in the US, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Switzerland – has lost its little credibility and will have no authority unless and until it indicts Western politicians and bureaucrats including Tony Blair, George W. Bush, Paul Wolfowitz, Victoria Nuland, Barack Obama (the king of the drones), Donald Trump, Nikolas Sarkozy, etc.,” De Zayas concluded.,10yrs On From Iraq War Logs Bush & Blair Should be in Prison Not Assange22 October 2020, 18:29 GMT。

B | 近日，带着两个孩子一边卖烧烤一边直播的重庆单身母亲林静受到全国各地的网友关注，并在一天时间里收到近30万元的爱心捐款。十年前，林静的大儿子淼淼（化名）出生。不幸的是，淼淼满月时被诊断患有先天性心脏病和“镜像”心脏（即心脏长在身体右侧）。手术时，淼淼又出现了严重的并发症——大脑血管堵塞引发严重癫痫。在爱心人士的帮助下，淼淼才艰难度过危机。此后，林静通过做家政、开塔吊、卖烧烤挣钱。

C | 直播火起来后，林静又加入到直播大军，希望能借着风口“能多挣一点是一点”。

D | 林静又是幸运的，她带着淼淼和小女儿直播卖烧烤的故事得到网友关注。

E | 1月19日，林静告诉澎湃新闻（www.thepaper.cn），她已经把网友捐助的渠道关闭了，暂时无需其他捐款。淼淼春林静的儿子淼淼节后的手术，当地政府也在帮助她对接协调。她感谢网友的关注，也希望能尽快回归平静的生活。以下是澎湃新闻和林静的对话：谈大儿子病情：期待手术效果，希望让他尽早回到学校澎湃新闻：目前淼淼的身体状况如何？林静：2024年，我带着淼淼去了北京，找到中国医学科学院阜外医院的专家给孩子看病，7月份的时候在阜外医院做了心脏手术。

F | 然后11月份去复查的，复查的结果挺好的，我们前段时间也给医院那边说了，年后去手术，但是住院单还没有开上，因为时间隔得太久了，还是要一个月以内。

G | 但是现在这两天，政府的工作人员跟我说，他们帮我安排这一系列的事情，帮我们对接，不需要我们再操心这个事情了。澎湃新闻：手术费凑齐了吗？林静：暂时够了，现在我们不需要额外的帮助，刚好趁着你们这个新闻，我也想表达一下感谢，感谢给我们捐了善款的网友，大家实在是盛情难却。我把支付宝、电话号码（等联系方式）都关了，大家还是很热情的想帮助我，我们现在不接受捐助了，大家给我点一个赞，给我一个关注就好了。澎湃新闻：淼淼对自己的病情有怎样的认知，他的心理状态如何？林静：他可能对这个病不是那么了解，但是他的病情他都知道，因为他的性格是比较阳光的，所以每次都是很正面地在回应这个事情。澎湃新闻：淼淼在上学吗？林静：原本他是在上学，因为上一次做了手术，他的身体状态不太好，身体机能啥的跟不上，所以说就休学了。我想的是，因为他春节后要做手术，做完了之后看他的身体情况。我还是想让他回归到学校去。因为在学校他可以和同龄的孩子有交流，会更有童趣。在家里面其实他失去了很多很多该有的乐趣。

H | 澎湃新闻：照顾淼淼，主要面临着哪些特殊的困难和挑战？林静：刚开始的时候肯定困难，我一个人带两个孩子，还要摆摊去挣钱，就有点心有余力不足，但现在好多了。澎湃新闻：你带着两个孩子摆摊时，两个孩子在干点啥？林静：他们就陪着我，有时候会帮忙。淼淼的话，他会在我摆摊的时候帮忙叫卖什么的。有时候他会摆一个小摊，他卖不到钱，他就着急，没有耐心。要么就在旁边，他自己和妹妹一起玩儿。谈直播走红：希望自己也能帮助更多的人澎湃新闻：你在网上是怎么火起来的？林静：我2019年的时候就开始发一些视频，记录日常生活中开心的、不开心的，主要是给自己加油鼓气。后来，有个两百多万粉丝的博主关注到我了，了解到我的故事之后就说要给我拍一期视频，当时我其实对自媒体不太了解，我觉得拍一期就拍一期嘛，结果没想到播放量、点赞量挺高的。

I | 虽然没有现在这么火，但我也挺意外。当时大家很多人给我捐款，我都没有接收。我说这么大一波流量来了，我想自己可以靠这个网络和流量，看看自己能不能长期带货或者是干一些其他的营生，自己给自己挣钱，给儿子做完手术。但是后面那个流量来得快，去得也快，差不多半个月左右的时候，就没啥流量了。

J | 所以说那一次后面再有人给我捐助的时候，大家都特别急，网友他们特别急，他们说为啥你不接受？儿子那么着急要做手术。所以说最后我考虑了很久之后才接受大家的第一笔捐赠就是从那个时候开始的。

K | 后面因为那个视频点赞量挺高的，所以也有很多大大小小的博主陆陆续续来拍一拍我，拍摄的时候流量还行，但是发完之后差不多半个月左右，就又沉寂了。澎湃新闻：你在网上有没有受到质疑，说你炒作之类的，你怎么看？林静：这个很正常，我觉得网络是一把双刃剑，其实有很多现实中知道我的，或者是从一开始就从我几千几百个粉丝就关注到我现在的粉丝，他们都知道我这一路是怎么走过来的，他们都在帮忙，为我澄清、为我发声，我真的很感动。看到负面评价，要说心里面没有波澜那是不可能的。我之前在工地上面开塔吊的时候，也被网暴过一次，就是我发布了一个很正常的生活日常，我不知道他们的关注点，他们就关注到其他地方了，导致我被网暴，郁闷了一两个月。所以说现在对网络这个评价的话，我会更平和一点，就是我觉得不会对我的心理造成很大的影响。

L | 因为我也知道网络这个东西，它本身接触的就是全国各个形形色色的人，什么人都有的。

M | 澎湃新闻：这两天还在摆摊卖烧烤吗？林静：今天开始没摆了，等等稍微人流量缓一点。我现在就是在璧山（区）一个镇上摆摊，昨天还在摆摊，好多人来买。我说咋这么多人，全是刷到视频过来的。

N | 我要是在主城那边的话，估计可能人会更多，主要是我女儿年龄太小了，有时候顾不过来。澎湃新闻：未来有什么打算？林静：这次的事情（指受到关注）给我启发挺大的。我本来是属于“弱者”，像我们这种家有重病患者的家庭，得到社会的关注，得到“强者”的帮助后，我的状况一下子就改变了。我也想慢慢让自己变好，去帮助到那些我之前想去帮助而帮助不到的人。